What You Think | radioinfo

What You Think

User Opinion Story
madman
1 May 2020 - 7:54pm
Some insightful appointments ARN is undertaking a commercial restructure
madman
1 May 2020 - 7:50pm
So good to see the Gold Coast / Tweed survey results. Especially that no Tweed stations are included. C,mon Bill. Hot Tomato smashes the Gold Coast:GfK Survey
Anthony The Koala
1 May 2020 - 3:41pm
I have noticed that certain commentators on commercial radio place the number of infections and deaths of various diseases and car accidents in relation to the population in order to downplay the significance and incidence of the covid-19 virus compared to car crashes and other epidemics. No matter how mild, the severity of the covid-19 infection affects everyone.

Rather, my analysis is computing Australia's risk management policies applied to other countries and applying other country's policy to Australia.

I am doing this because I am continually indignant at some commentators on commercial radio AND in "The Australian" who pursue the economy ahead of peoples' lives and the policies led by US shock jocks and other leaders.

The data of select countries:
Country,pop, pop density, deaths
US 331002651, 36, 63861
Brazil 212559417, 25, 6006
United Kingdom 67886011, 281, 26771
South Korea 51269185, 527, 248
Australia 2549884, 3 , 93
Sweden 10099265, 25, 2586

Source data:
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdUOA?Si

Remark: It assumes that all countries have notice of the start of the pandemic in 2019. This does not take into account (i) the testing regimes and policy of the particular country, (ii) the lockdown policies applied in each country, (iii) the various governments' reaction and implementation of testing and lockdown policies, and (iv) whether the particular country is on either the upside of the curve, the middle of the curve or the end of the curve.

Furthermore while some parts of Australia such as the ACT and NT are relatively covid-19 free, it does not mean that the rest of the Australia is covid-19 free and it does not mean that the rest of the world is covid-19 free.

Using the above data sources:
If Australia was a particular country. In other words, if a particular country adopted Australia's policy
Particular country (pop)/Australia (pop) * Aust(death)
US: 331002651/2549884 * 93 = 12072 << 63861
Brazil: 212559417/2549884*93 = 7753 > 6006
UK: 67886011/2549884*93 = 2475 << 26771
Sth Korea: 51269185/2549884*93 = 1870 >> 248
Sweden: 10099265/2549884*93 = 368 << 2586

If Australia adopted a particular country's policy, estimate of deaths in Australia.
Australia's pop/particular country's pop * Australian deaths
US: 2549884/331002651*63861 = 491 >> 93
Brazil: 2549884/212559417*6006 = 72 < 93
UK: 2549884/67886011*26771 = 1006 >> 93
Sth Korea: 2549884/51269185*248 = 12 << 93
Sweden: 2549884/10099265*2586 = 653 >> 93

Legend:
'<' = less than,
'<<' = much less than
'>' = greater than
'>> = much greater than.

Comment:
If Australia's lockdown and testing policies were applied to other countries, the number of deaths in the US, the UK and Sweden would benefit from Australia's policies and possibly South Korea.

With the exception of South Korea, Australia's death rate would be worse if we adopted the lockdown and testing policies of other countries such as the UK, Sweden and US. The US figure is complicated by the various states' testing and lockdown policies.

If Australia adopted South Korea's lockdown and testing policies, the total death rates would be much less. According to the table at the start of article, South Korea's population density is the highest of any country in the world. It appears that population density may have no part given that South Korea's population density is greater than the UK and US. On the other hand, for the US's NYC, the density is 10137 per km squared which is 19 times South Korea's population density. More studies are needed to ascertain whether testing and lockdown policies have a statistical significance on population densities

On the other hand, caution should sti for the US, NYC has a density of 10137 people per squared kilometre. Further studies on the effect of infection and population density

NYC:
Area of NYC = 790km^2
Population of NYC = 8,008,278
Density = 8008278/790 = 10137per km squared.
https://www.britannica.com/place/New-York-City

However, the death rate in Australia could well be much lower if the death rates from the "Ruby Princess" passenger ship were negated. The death rates from the "Ruby Princess" is ongoing due to an outbreak in Tasmania, https://www.9news.com.au/national/ruby-princess-coronavirus-cruise-ship-ground-zero-tasmania-cluster-northwest/c7cd45b2-8244-4a8a-8429-a9b04ed8180b

As our Prime Minister said on 2GB, 1500, 01-05-2020 said "...we need to restart our economy as soon as it is safe to do so...". But lets hope that "....keeping Australia out of the douna...." is not early such as to cause another wave of covid-19 infections.

When the covid-19 epidemic is over, there will be a lot of studies done as to which country had the best policy in mitigating deaths. But it is not only deaths, but the possible physiological damage to organs due to the covid-19 epidemic.

Thank you,
Anthony of analytical Belfield
ABC backs Swan's integrity in response to COVID19 related article in The Australian
World TV International
1 May 2020 - 1:00am
RIP Peter, great handing over to you when you were presenting the breakfast show at 3KZ in 1979. A total professional and super nice guy. Vale Peter O'Callaghan
Anthony The Koala
29 April 2020 - 10:31am
I've said elsewhere on this site that Fran Kelly (RN sourced from Sydney) has beaten Alan Jones (2GB sourced from Sydney).

This time the listenership of Fran is more than three times of Alan.

The Canberra market is odd such that RN rates higher than commercial talk stations. In other capital cities, RN rates between 2%-3%.

Thank you,
Anthony of exciting Belfield
Changes at the top in Canberra: GfK survey
Secret Squid
28 April 2020 - 10:35am
It would be fantastic to hear 4BC pull the plug on 2GB. It's Sydney-centric - everything Brisbane hates.

Every major capital has its own commercial talk station, all but Brisbane. We have to listen to the garbage they pump up the line from 2GB .... actually very few are listening to 4BC or the other nine networked AM 4BH.

Save your electricity bill and hand in the licences.
Tony Moclair gets a recall to 3AW
Anthony The Koala
27 April 2020 - 3:46pm
Many of the frequencies listed in the final paragraph are from Rete Italia. There was no news in other media other than from "Il Globo", that the Italian language programs would cease on these frequencies from August 22, 2019, reference:
https://ilglobo.com/news/changes-to-rete-italia-44716/#

Overall 21 frequencies have ceased transmission of Italian language programming.

It brings home the reality of the costs of running a radio station. Those closed frequencies are relay-stations, so the major cost would be the cost of powering the transmitters and baseband signal relays.

Thank you,
Anthony of Belfield
Gosford gets a new racing and sports station
Wendy Jane
24 April 2020 - 12:41pm
Thank you to MediaHeads - another lovely piece, thought provoking, respectful and sincere. Your station’s invited to broadcast a special Gallipoli commemoration at 11:30am
Eugene Delargy
21 April 2020 - 4:04pm
This is the last of the conventional data as we know it.

CRA and GFK have maintained a contract for years yet have still not developed a real time, electronic based method of data gathering for audience measurement.

Along comes the pandemic created by the negligence or malevolence of the Chinese Communist party and GFK is unable to collect data for CRA thus resulting in the entire medium of radio not having any conventional audience measurement to demonstrate the likely increased numbers of radio audience.

What could have been the greatest story of radio's popularity in what is a dark era of history has been lost.

CRA and GFK will claim to be able to do other research but it will not be the conventional research to use for comparative evaluation.

Let's face it, we know the current hodge podge of survey diaries and online recruiting (through nebulous surveys for cash websites) is not the best compared to TV or online, but it is miles better than suspending usual audience research and beginning less objective research.
TSL for radio is up during COVID19: GfK
Anthony The Koala
20 April 2020 - 9:37am
I did not like the attacks on Dr Norman Swan in "The Australian". Nor do I like most of the comments associated with the article which are typically anti-ABC.

Dr Norman Swan is an AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Agency)-registered medical practitioner with the following qualifications:

* Membership of the Royal College of Physicians of London, Royal College of Physicians of London, United Kingdom, 1980
* Diploma in Child Health, Royal Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons of London, United Kingdom, 1978
* Bachelor of Medicine / Bachelor of Surgery, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 1976

source: https://www.ahpra.gov.au/Registration/Registers-of-Practitioners.aspx?q=MED0000994679&t=qskndOu0HqTxp0GwFq9A

All practising medical practitioners are required to undergo continuing education programs in order that their skills are up-to-date and to maintain their registration status.

Dr Swan is one of the best science and medical communicators in the media and is called on by the ABC as its medical expert on various ABC programs such as "ABC News", "7:30" and "The Drum". Apart from the "Health Report" on RN, his knowledge is called upon on other RN,ABC702 (2BL) and ABCNewsRadio. In addition there is a comprehensive podcast "Coronacast".

https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/coronacast/

All tertiary-educated graduates are required to develop critical analytical skills and is not mindless parroting and that includes doctors.

Dr Swan speaks from a medical standpoint that is evidence-based. Like other presenters he has the right to comment on government policies which lack the urgency of implementing social distancing and other policies not to congregate in crowds such as sporting matches, restaurants, theatres, houses of worship and beaches to name a few.

There may well be other countries whose social distancing policies have been implemented too late, or situations where a number of a nation's top medical advisers have been reduced.

Then there are situations where the policy is to let the virus "rip" and people will develop a herd immunity.

But there is no coronavirus vaccine and there is no herd immunity.To get a herd immunity from the current pandemic implementing the "let it rip" policy requires greater numbers of people to die. Such a policy has no due regard to the history of the original meaning of "flattening the curve" where in 1919 in the US, one state implemented a "let it rip" policy and thousands died and another state implemented shutdowns and "social distancing" measures and fewer people died.

The "let it rip" mentality results in hospitals being overwhelmed with patients not being able to be properly treated and other patients being prioritised based on the utilitarian ethic of some people being worth more than others. That is quite dodgy and evil.

Shock jock, conspiracy theorist and non-evidenced based potion salesperson Alex Jones was leading a group of citizens who want an end to lockdowns calling the coronavirus a hoax, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/18/stay-at-home-order-protest-lockdown-maryland-texas-ohio .

The problem with media commentators particularly in newspapers and commercial radio want to get people quickly to return to work. One economics commentator at "The Australian" seems to treat the elderly as expendible in order to keep the economy going, https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/we-may-be-overreacting-to-an-unremarkable-coronavirus/news-story/3d78be873fac364af49f5fc949e3eaeb (subscription may be needed).

You wouldn't want one of your loved ones to die on the altar of the economic cause. "The Australian"'s article is not unique. No tombstone will say, "In loving memory of the deceased who died to keep the economy running".

Not all economists take this morally repungant view. 32 of the US's leading economists from the Democrats and Republican parties have argued that the current lockdown and social-distancing measures are good for the economy, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/economists-publish-letter-save-lives-republican-democrat-economy-coronavirus-pandemic-2020-3?r=US&IR=T.

Even our economists don't want our Prime Minister to relax the lockdown and social distancing measures.

These economists "...believe a callous indifference to life is morally objectionable, and that it would be a mistake to expect a premature loosening of restrictions to be beneficial to the economy and jobs, given the rapid rate of contagion.

It is wishful thinking to believe we face a choice between a buoyant economy without social distancing and a deep recession with social distancing...."
https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business-law/open-letter-122-australian-economists-dont-sacrifice-health-economy

As I said elsewhere on this site, the economy is the people and the people are the economy.

Like the car accident analogy that you can replace the car anytime but not a human. Similarly, you can replace an economy but not a human life. Taking the extreme "let it rip" OR re-opening the economy before the virus is rendered quashed will cause another wave of infections and hospitals overwhelmed and the economic cost is greater.

What of the future? Dr Norman Swan in the last half of Coronacast podcast says that travelling to and from overseas destinations is the last priority to engage with the rest of the world.

He suggests a gradual re-introduction of economic activity starting with schools and daycare centres practising social distance measuring. Social distancing measures should continue with restaurants until there are very few reported incidents of "one, two or three", or "zero". It may be some time before gatherings at sporting matches and the theatre resume.

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/coronacast/australia-is-doing-well.-but-where-are-we-heading-next/12148024

In the end, Dr Swan sums it up by being critical of the very economists and businesses who are indifferent to the 1% who succumbed to the disease. Referring to the mortality rates in the US, "... Some people in business who want the restrictions lifted now say, oh well, if it's under 1%, this is not something to worry about, it's starting to look like seasonal flu. Well, try telling that to one of the 22,000 families who have lost somebody in the United States...."

Thank you,
Anthony of thinking and concerned Belfield
ABC backs Swan's integrity in response to COVID19 related article in The Australian

Pages

radioinfo ABN: 87 004 005 109  P O Box 6430 North Ryde NSW 2113 Australia.  |  All content © 2012. All Rights Reserved.