You've reached our premium or archival content
To access this page, and more great content just like it, you need to become a paid subscriber.
If you already have an account, please login.
Otherwise, registration is quick and you'll have access instantly after payment.
It seems that radioGPT resembles chatGPT with the addition that radioGPT includes automation of presentation and programming.
Both bots rely on the information on the web and both make/synthesize decisions based on the available information.
It does not appear that these bots will innovate programming.
I wonder if management who use these bots will rely too much on the bots and not try to innovate programming.
No matter how useful these tools are, management relying on bots will look inwards and not think of unique ways to build an audience.
As a result, if the nature of programming changes and the data and information is not available, how will programmers innovate?
Bots may be OK when there is no imminent threat to radical changes in listeners' wants.
Then if many radio stations in a particular market use the same bots won't decisions revert to the mean with programming output sounding bland?
As a result it may be difficult for a particular station to have a winning edge in a crowded market.
Thank you
Anthony of bland Belfield in the land of the Wangal and Darug peoples of the Eora Nation.